Which 3PLs publish their pricing publicly?

Almost every major 3PL describes itself as transparent. Most of them mean something different by that word than you might think. We audited the public pricing pages of ShipBob, ShipMonk, Red Stag Fulfillment, eFulfillment Service, and Huboo and quoted them directly.


The scorecard

How each 3PL handles pricing on their public pages

Three questions. Six companies. Sourced directly from their own pricing pages.

Company Rate card published Starting price shown Quote form required
ShipBob No No Yes
ShipMonk No No Yes
Red Stag Fulfillment No No Yes
eFulfillment Service No No Yes
Huboo No £1,000/mo Yes
Hermeslines Yes From $0.99 No


The evidence

What each pricing page actually says

Verbatim quotes. Live URLs. Date-stamped.

01

ShipBob

Source: shipbob.com/pricing · Modified Sep 29, 2025
Clear outsourced order fulfillment pricing— ShipBob /pricing, page H1

ShipBob’s headline contains the word “Clear.” The page itself contains no rates. Every pricing question routes to a quote form.

Fill out this form and a fulfillment expert will be in touch to start the conversation on whether we’d be a good mutual fit for your business.— ShipBob /pricing, FAQ on getting a quote
What they publish
Names of four fee categories
Customer testimonials
The phrase “Clear pricing”
What they don’t
Any per-pick fee
Any storage rate
Any minimum or starting price
Any rate visible without a form

For a full side-by-side of Hermeslines vs ShipBob — including worked pricing examples, ShipBob figures attributed to primary sources, and the places where ShipBob actually beats us — see our full ShipBob comparison page.

02

ShipMonk

Source: shipmonk.com/pricing · Modified May 6, 2026
Every fee explained. Every dollar maximized for your success.— ShipMonk /pricing, page subheadline

ShipMonk promises “every fee explained” on a page that publishes no rates. It does explain ShipMonk’s monthly minimum formula in unusual detail:

We do this by multiplying your monthly order volume by your first item pick fee and then reducing it by 20%.— ShipMonk /pricing, FAQ on monthly minimums

Every variable in that formula — your order volume, your pick fee — is only disclosed after you fill out a quote form. The formula is published; the inputs are not.

What they publish
Names of four fee categories
Monthly minimum formula
“Software included at no charge”
What they don’t
Any per-pick fee or storage rate
The actual monthly minimum dollar amount
Any starting price
Any rate visible without a form

03

Red Stag Fulfillment

Source: redstagfulfillment.com/get-pricing · Modified Aug 28, 2025
Pricing as unique as your business.— Red Stag /get-pricing, page H1

Red Stag’s pricing page is, structurally, a multi-step intake form. The form asks for name, email, phone, company, current fulfillment solution, product type, average package weight, monthly volume, SKU count, biggest challenge, and how the visitor heard about Red Stag. Of all the fields on the form, only one is optional.

There are no dollar figures published anywhere on the page — no per-pick fee, no storage rate, no minimum, no starting price.

What they publish
Service guarantees
A multi-step intake form
Industry rate ranges on a separate page
What they don’t
Any of Red Stag’s own rates
Any starting price or minimum
Any pricing visible without submission

04

eFulfillment Service

Source: efulfillmentservice.com/friendly-terms-pricing · Modified Jan 4, 2024
At eFulfillment Service, our experience and expertise combine with flexible terms and full transparency in order to provide eCommerce merchants with a complete outsourced order fulfillment solution.— eFulfillment Service /friendly-terms-pricing

eFulfillment Service uses the word “transparency” in its lead pricing copy. The page publishes no rates. The pricing summary consists of four qualitative bullets: no setup fees, no minimum order requirements, award-winning service, pay-as-you-go.

What they publish
“No setup fees”
“No minimums”
“Pay-as-you-go”
“Full transparency” (as a phrase)
What they don’t
Any per-order rate
Any storage rate
Any inbound or returns rate
Any starting price

05

Huboo

Source: huboo.com/fulfilment/fulfilment-costs · Modified Dec 10, 2025
As an industry leader, we’re committed to have a transparent pricing structure. We want it to be easy for you to compare our service levels and costs with anyone else in the market.— Huboo /fulfilment-costs

Huboo makes the strongest transparency claim of any of the five 3PLs we audited. They publish one concrete figure — a £1,000 monthly starting price — and route everything else to a quote form.

From just £1,000 per month, you can get started with our award-winning fulfilment solutions.— Huboo /fulfilment-costs

Huboo is the most transparent of the five by this measure: they publish a starting price. They are not transparent in the sense most ecommerce founders mean it — you still cannot calculate your costs without going through their sales team.

What they publish
£1,000 monthly starting price
Names of five service buckets
“Transparent pricing structure” claim
What they don’t
Any per-item fulfilment rate
Any per-pallet storage rate
Any returns or extra-services rate
Anything that lets you calculate your costs

The alternative

What we do differently

Every Hermeslines rate is published on a single page: our pricing page. Pick-and-pack from $0.99. Storage from $13.01 per pallet at the 15+ tier. FBA prep at $60 per hour. No quote form required. No “starting at” hiding the real number. No “request access” gate.

We do this for two reasons. First, because most of our customers are small ecommerce brands without time to chase quotes from six 3PLs. Publishing the rate card is the most respectful thing we can do with their time. Second, because we think the industry’s current approach to pricing is bad for the people buying it — and we’d rather be the alternative.

If our published rates don’t work for you, you’ll know in 90 seconds. If they do, you can contact us with most of the questions already answered.


Questions

Frequently asked

The questions prospects ask us about this page, and our answers.

Why don’t most 3PLs publish their pricing?

The most common explanation given by 3PLs is that pricing varies by product type, volume, weight, and shipping destination, so a single rate card can’t capture the complexity. There’s truth in this — fulfillment pricing does have many variables. But the same variables exist for carrier rates (UPS, FedEx, USPS) and those carriers publish full rate tables. The deeper reason gated pricing persists is that it pulls prospects into a sales conversation where the 3PL can negotiate. Published pricing removes that lever.

How do you compare to ShipBob, ShipMonk, or Red Stag on price?

For ShipBob specifically, we built a full side-by-side comparison page using third-party-reported figures (attributed to specific primary sources) alongside our published rates. For ShipMonk and Red Stag, we haven’t built head-to-head pages yet — anyone claiming such a comparison is working from third-party estimates rather than published numbers. What we can tell you about ourselves: Our fulfillment pricing starts at $0.99 per pick-and-pack, $13.01 per pallet per month at the 15+ tier, $60/hr for prep services. Compare against any rates you obtain from competitors in your own quote process.

What if a competitor adds their rates to their pricing page?

That would be good for the industry and we’d update this page to reflect it. The point isn’t to make any specific company look bad — the point is that the current industry standard treats prospects like leads to be captured rather than people trying to make an informed decision. If that changes, we’ll change with it.

Methodology and updates

All quotes on this page were verified live on the date noted below. Each competitor’s pricing page was fetched, read, and quoted directly. No claim on this page is paraphrased or inferred — every claim is sourced to a URL we have on file with a date stamp.

We re-verify this page annually. If you notice that any claim here is out of date or incorrect, tell us and we’ll fix it.

Audit log: Initial publication May 18, 2026 · Source pages verified May 18, 2026 · Next scheduled re-audit: May 2027